site map



Health news:
June 2010 - Dec 2013

Minimizing breast cancer risk

May 2010

Time to move beyond salt ?

Salt hypothesis vs. reality

Is sodium bad?

April 2010

Salt studies: the latest score

From Dahl to INTERSALT

Salt hypothesis' story

March 2010

Salt war

Do bone drugs work?

Diabetes vs. drugs, 3:0?

February 2010

The MMR vaccine war: Wakefield vs. ?

Wakefield proceedings: an exception?

Who's afraid of a littl' 1998 study?

January 2010

Antibiotic children

Physical activity benefits late-life health

Healthier life for New Year's resolution


December 2009

Autism epidemic worsening: CDC report

Rosuvastatin indication broadened

High-protein diet effects


November 2009

Folic acid cancer risk

Folic acid studies: message in a bottle?

Sweet, short life on a sugary diet


October 2009

Smoking health hazards: no dose-response

C. difficile warning

Asthma risk and waist size in women


September 2009

Antioxidants' melanoma risk: 4-fold or none?

Murky waters of vitamin D status

Is vitamin D deficiency hurting you?


August 2009

Pill-crushing children

New gut test for children and adults

Unhealthy habits - whistling past the graveyard?


July 2009

Asthma solution - between two opposites that don't attract

Light wave therapy - how does it actually work?

Hodgkin's lymphoma in children: better alternatives


June 2009

Hodgkin's, kids, and the abuse of power

Efficacy and safety of the conventional treatment for Hodgkin's:
behind the hype

Long-term mortality and morbidity after conventional treatments for pediatric Hodgkin's


May 2009

Late health effects of the toxicity of the conventional treatment for Hodgkin's

Daniel's true 5-year chances with the conventional treatment for Hodgkin's

Daniel Hauser Hodgkin's case: child protection or medical oppression?

April 2009

Protection from EMF: you're on your own

EMF pollution battle: same old...

EMF health threat and the politics of status quo

March 2009

Electromagnetic danger? No such thing, in our view...

EMF safety standards: are they safe?

Power-frequency field exposure

February 2009

Electricity and health

Electromagnetic spectrum: health connection

Is power pollution making you sick?

January 2009

Pneumococcal vaccine for adults useless?

DHA in brain development study - why not boys?

HRT shrinks brains


Bookmark and Share


Health and nutritional supplements

}Nutritional supplements - Random vs. optimum - Broad balanced - Herbal

Use of nutritional supplements is more popular than ever. As people are becoming aware of the health significance of nutrients, it becomes more obvious that optimizing nutritional intake with food supplements will improve their health.

If so, why all the commotion and confusion about dietary supplementation? Some supposedly informed sources state that self-supplementation will do you more harm than good, while others swear that you are doomed if you don't do it. Who should you trust?

Politics of nutrition aside, no one serious will argue against supplementing the diet, provided - as with anything else - that

you know what you are doing.

Your body is a bio-chemical factory of unimaginable complexity; at any given moment, thousands of chemical reactions are taking place inside it, many of them directly or indirectly depending on each other. No computer in the world is sophisticated enough to synchronize and maintain this process - a task that your brain seems to be carrying out effortlessly from one moment to another.

This flow of life requires

constant, complete and balanced intake of nutrients.

The problem is - you just don't know specifically which ones, when and in what quantity. Reliable diagnostic tests (NOT the standard serum blood test) can give useful guidance, but it is still far from a complete picture, and still leaves plenty of room for guesswork. Without tests, you are pretty much clueless. Considering the number of nutrients and processes they perpetuate and affect in your highly individual metabolic process, your chances of having positive impact on your health with randomly selected supplements are about as good as to get to work safely driving blindfolded.

Longer-term higher doses of randomly selected nutrients are much more likely to result in nutritional imbalances,

causing health problems down the road,

rather than to protect you, or bring relief.

Good example is the ongoing calcium craze. Stuffing yourself with calcium without knowing your calcium body levels (serum calcium is not reliable indicator), nor your individual efficiency of calcium absorption and utilization is inviting trouble. Putting aside that you may not need calcium supplementation if your diet is balanced (no excess protein, sugar, phosphates, etc.), excessive calcium intake without adequate increase in intake of the key nutrients needed for its absorption and use (vitamin D, zinc, copper, boron and magnesium, among others) will prevent your body from efficiently using it, and put you at the

increased risk of calcifying your blood vessels (cardiovascular disease factor) and other soft tissues (arthritis, kidney disease)

instead of your bones.

And if you add, say, extra vitamin D -especially its synthetic form, D2 - you risk vitamin D toxicity (because it gets stored by the body). If you add significant magnesium supplementation, you risk lowered stomach acid (which also can be caused by high calcium intake alone). Low stomach acid can, in turn, cause lower absorption of other nutrients, like iron, vitamin B12, or manganese (while calcium and magnesium absorption remains unaffected), digestive problems and development of new deficiencies.

Longer-term, your blood lipids can also be affected: high calcium tends to negatively affect triglycerides balance, and high magnesium your good-to-bad cholesterol ratio.

In short, your health could be more, not less endangered.

Another problem with health supplements is that their quality - measured by their actual active contents, their bioavailability and degree of contamination - can vary widely from one to another. While you can reduce the risk of buying inferior product by avoiding the cheapest ones, it still

doesn't guarantee that you are getting a quality supplement.

It is always a good idea to contact the manufacturer and obtain additional information on the supplement you are interested in. Then do your own little research, to find out how it all adds up.

If you can't get useful information on the product, or - worse yet - can't contact the supplement's manufacturer at all, it is better to pass it.

Assuming that you use quality dietary supplements, how healthful they are depends mainly on how you use them. There are three possibilities.

Random selective supplementation is not likely to benefit you, but can easily compromise your health.

Broad-spectrum balanced supplementation is generally beneficial, but not likely to correct existing serious nutritional imbalances resulting from poor eating habits or health condition.

Optimum supplementation, your best bet, is based on your nutritional status, regularly updated with appropriate lab tests, and individually optimized diet

However, always remember that the best possible form of nutritional and health supplementation is just that: supplement to your diet. No supplementation can compensate for grossly imbalanced, poor diet, or unhealthy lifestyle.