site map



Health news:
June 2010 - Dec 2013

Minimizing breast cancer risk

May 2010

Time to move beyond salt ?

Salt hypothesis vs. reality

Is sodium bad?

April 2010

Salt studies: the latest score

From Dahl to INTERSALT

Salt hypothesis' story

March 2010

Salt war

Do bone drugs work?

Diabetes vs. drugs, 3:0?

February 2010

The MMR vaccine war: Wakefield vs. ?

Wakefield proceedings: an exception?

Who's afraid of a littl' 1998 study?

January 2010

Antibiotic children

Physical activity benefits late-life health

Healthier life for New Year's resolution


December 2009

Autism epidemic worsening: CDC report

Rosuvastatin indication broadened

High-protein diet effects


November 2009

Folic acid cancer risk

Folic acid studies: message in a bottle?

Sweet, short life on a sugary diet


October 2009

Smoking health hazards: no dose-response

C. difficile warning

Asthma risk and waist size in women


September 2009

Antioxidants' melanoma risk: 4-fold or none?

Murky waters of vitamin D status

Is vitamin D deficiency hurting you?


August 2009

Pill-crushing children

New gut test for children and adults

Unhealthy habits - whistling past the graveyard?


July 2009

Asthma solution - between two opposites that don't attract

Light wave therapy - how does it actually work?

Hodgkin's lymphoma in children: better alternatives


June 2009

Hodgkin's, kids, and the abuse of power

Efficacy and safety of the conventional treatment for Hodgkin's:
behind the hype

Long-term mortality and morbidity after conventional treatments for pediatric Hodgkin's


May 2009

Late health effects of the toxicity of the conventional treatment for Hodgkin's

Daniel's true 5-year chances with the conventional treatment for Hodgkin's

Daniel Hauser Hodgkin's case: child protection or medical oppression?

April 2009

Protection from EMF: you're on your own

EMF pollution battle: same old...

EMF health threat and the politics of status quo

March 2009

Electromagnetic danger? No such thing, in our view...

EMF safety standards: are they safe?

Power-frequency field exposure

February 2009

Electricity and health

Electromagnetic spectrum: health connection

Is power pollution making you sick?

January 2009

Pneumococcal vaccine for adults useless?

DHA in brain development study - why not boys?

HRT shrinks brains


Bookmark and Share


March 2008

Drugs in your drinking water

Is there a connection between prescription drugs, water you drink, and you? You bet. Recent investigation by the Associated Press added more details to what is already known - that unmetabolized drugs, both non-prescription and prescription, flashed down the toilets arrive at waste water management plants and, from there, find their way into your drinking water.

And in rather wide variety. Painkillers, tranquilizers, heart medications, hormones, anticonvulsants, sexual stimulants, antibiotics - you name it.

No one knows for sure which ones, or how many altogether, because testing for them is either non-existent, or very limited. The highest count in the AP investigation was for Philadelphia - 56 pharmaceutical chemicals. But you can be assured, there's more than that; and, whenever there is a few that tested positive, there are many more.

We are talking about very low levels of contamination, much lower than any individual dose. On the other hand, we are also talking about dozens and dozens of such trace contaminants pouring into your body day in and day out, for decades. Also, it is largely unknown what kind of interactions drug residues undergo with other water contaminants, as well as chemical agents purposely added to it - particularly chlorine.

The question is, of course, does it affect your health? Officials, both from EPA and water provider facilities are quick to declare that drinking water is safe. As a matter of fact, they don't really know it. Federal government doesn't require testing, nor has sat safety limits of any kind for pharmaceuticals in drinking water. Very little of research on the subject has been done.

Some water suppliers don't even think we should know about it. According to the AP, head representative of the major California water suppliers stated that public doesn't know how to properly interpret that information, and could become "too alarmed".

Remember that - apparently, some public officials think that they can decide

what information related to your health
is appropriate - or not - for you to know.

What we do know for sure is that pharmaceutical contaminants affects aquatic and soil wildlife. The fish is probably affected the most, due to the effect of bio-magnification, causing contaminant concentration to rise sharply going toward the top predator - in this case from plankton and plankton eating water inhabitants, to smaller and large fish.

But don't forget: we are the top planet predator, and it all finally comes to us - not only through drinking water.

Of course, meat and dairy are another significant source of pharmaceutical contaminants, from synthetic hormones and antibiotics that the animals are treated with.

So, what can you do to prevent pharmaceutical - and other - residues from entering your body? Not much. You can use water filter, a good one, but it is not likely to remove more than a fraction of these contaminants from your water. You can try to find some source of relatively untouched, pristine water - there are still a few left - but unless you're lucky enough to have it locally, it is likely to be expensive.   R