|
■
Home ■ site map |
healthknot.com |
|
Health news:
May 2010
April 2010
Salt studies: the latest score
March 2010
February 2010
The MMR vaccine war: Wakefield vs. ? Wakefield proceedings: an exception?
Who's afraid of a littl' 1998 study?
January 2010
Physical activity benefits late-life health Healthier life for New Year's resolution
December 2009
Autism epidemic worsening: CDC report Rosuvastatin indication broadened
November 2009
Folic acid studies: message in a bottle? Sweet, short life on a sugary diet
October 2009
Smoking health hazards: no dose-response Asthma risk and waist size in women
September 2009
Antioxidants' melanoma risk: 4-fold or none? Murky waters of vitamin D status Is vitamin D deficiency hurting you?
August 2009
New gut test for children and adults Unhealthy habits - whistling past the graveyard?
July 2009
Asthma solution - between two opposites that don't attract Light wave therapy - how does it actually work?
Hodgkin's lymphoma in children: better
alternatives
June 2009
Hodgkin's, kids, and the abuse of power
Efficacy and safety of the
conventional treatment for Hodgkin's:
Long-term mortality and morbidity after
conventional treatments for pediatric Hodgkin's
May 2009
Late health effects of the toxicity of the conventional treatment for Hodgkin's Daniel's true 5-year chances with the conventional treatment for Hodgkin's Daniel Hauser Hodgkin's case: child protection or medical oppression?
April 2009
Protection from EMF: you're on your own EMF pollution battle: same old...
EMF
health threat and the politics of status quo
March 2009
Electromagnetic danger? No such thing, in our view...
February 2009
Electromagnetic spectrum: health connection Is power pollution making you sick?
January 2009
Pneumococcal vaccine for adults useless? DHA in brain development study - why not boys?
|
July 2007Is your exercise healthful?
How healthful is
exercising in polluted air? New
York Times article by Gretchen Reynolds gives you good reasons to
take this question seriously. Recent studies seem to be
positively linking outdoor air pollutants - in particular
"fine particulates" (soot) - not only to respiratory system
ailments, but also to increased risk of heart attack.
The American Hearth Association acknowledged this in 2004. While exercising, you take in up to 20 times more air than sedentary person. This effectively increases body exposure to any toxin, or pollutant present in the air by as much. In other words, what is normally considered to be safe level of pollution, can easily turn into dangerous and harmful while exercising. For instance, the maximum safe PM2.5 (particles smaller than 2.5 microns) standard, as 24-hour average, is set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 15μg/m3. At 15-fold the sedentary air intake, it effectively becomes 225μg/m3, considered by the EPA to be "unhealthy" 1-hour average, and quite close to the "very unhealthy" level, beginning at 250μg/m3. How this dramatic effective increase in air pollution due to exercising may affect your health depends on several factors, including your air quality level, frequency, duration and intensity of exercise, as well as your individual vulnerability. While short-term effects shouldn't be worrisome for most folks, long-term effect is a big unknown. Even the EPA's safe level is not tested long-term, and may not be harmless for all. It may parallel, say, vitamin C DRI (~100mg/day), which is pretty much guaranteed to safeguard you from scurvy, but puts your health at a serious risk from compromising your health, being grossly bellow the longer-term optimum, estimated at anywhere from 400mg to 5 grams a day. And those exercising indoors are not out of the woods either. In fact, indoor air is on average 5-10 times more contaminated than outdoor air. Air-purifiers are efficient for larger particles, but most become increasingly inefficient as the particle size goes bellow 0.1μ (they can be smaller than 0.01μ). And it is exactly those smallest particles - so called "ultra fine" and "nano" particles - that can penetrate through the lungs into the blood, with the potential of causing, or contributing to vasoactive (constriction/dilation) and atherosclerotic blood vessel changes. Considering high average level of indoor air contamination, indoor exercising is probably more unhealthy than outdoor's, despite the use of air-purifying systems. Special concern are commonly high levels of the volatile organic compounds. In conclusion, we simply cannot ignore air quality, even for our regular daily activities, and especially when it comes to regular exercise. Exercising in heavily polluted air is highly undesirable, and can't be considered healthful. The problem for many is that the air is polluted in their wider area. In such case, it is recommendable to adjust (scale down) exercise frequency and intensity according to the pollution level. R YOUR BODY ┆ HEALTH RECIPE ┆ NUTRITION ┆ TOXINS ┆ SYMPTOMS |