|
■
Home ■ site map |
healthknot.com |
|
Health news:
February 2010
The MMR vaccine war: Wakefield vs. ? Wakefield proceedings: an exception?
Who's afraid of a littl' 1998 study?
January 2010
Physical activity benefits late-life health Healthier life for New Year's resolution
December 2009
Autism epidemic worsening: CDC report Rosuvastatin indication broadened
November 2009
Folic acid studies: message in a bottle? Sweet, short life on a sugary diet
October 2009
Smoking health hazards: no dose-response Asthma risk and waist size in women
September 2009
Antioxidants' melanoma risk: 4-fold or none? Murky waters of vitamin D status Is vitamin D deficiency hurting you?
August 2009
New gut test for children and adults Unhealthy habits - whistling past the graveyard?
July 2009
Asthma solution - between two opposites that don't attract Light wave therapy - how does it actually work?
Hodgkin's lymphoma in children: better
alternatives
June 2009
Hodgkin's, kids, and the abuse of power
Efficacy and safety of the
conventional treatment for Hodgkin's:
Long-term mortality and morbidity after
conventional treatments for pediatric Hodgkin's
May 2009
Late health effects of the toxicity of the conventional treatment for Hodgkin's Daniel's true 5-year chances with the conventional treatment for Hodgkin's Daniel Hauser Hodgkin's case: child protection or medical oppression?
April 2009
Protection from EMF: you're on your own EMF pollution battle: same old...
EMF
health threat and the politics of status quo
March 2009
Electromagnetic danger? No such thing, in our view...
February 2009
Electromagnetic spectrum: health connection Is power pollution making you sick?
January 2009
Pneumococcal vaccine for adults useless? DHA in brain development study - why not boys? |
August 2008 Diabetes-arsenic linkI t's been known that exposure to arsenic from drinking water contributes to development of diabetes. For years, this fact was overshadowed by its cancer risk, which prompted new lowered standard for allowable level of arsenic in drinking water in 2001. But the story of arsenic toxicity doesn't seem to be ending yet. Even at low concentrations, there may still be a significant diabetes-arsenic link, as a recent study indicates.The study by Navas-Acien et al. (published in JAMA, 08/20/2008)analyzed urine arsenic level in 788 adults, 7.7% of which had diabetes two. It has found that the average arsenic level for the entire group was 7.1 micrograms/liter (or 7.1 parts per billion, ppb). After adjustments for diabetes risk factors, the group with diabetes had 26% higher average arsenic level than the rest of participants. Breaking down the numbers, the average level of arsenic for the diabetes two group was 8.8 ppb, vs. 7ppb in the non-diabetic group. Comparison of the incidence rate near the high and low end of the range (80the vs. 20th percentile) gave the odds of developing diabetes 3.6 times higher near the high end. If we apply that figure, roughly, on the overall incidence rate of 7.7%, those with elevated arsenic level are in the proximity of 25%, or one in four incidence of type 2 diabetes. What is particularly worrisome, is how infinitesimally small amount of arsenic in your system can significantly increase your risk of developing diabetes. We are talking about less than 2 parts per billion over the average urine concentration! Just recall that until 2001 the official limit to acceptable level of arsenic in drinking water was 50 ppb! And all three average levels in the study - for the entire group, diabetics and non-diabetics - are still bellow the current official limit of 10 ppb. It doesn't make you feel better knowing that arsenic is also potent carcinogen. It is also significant contributing factor to developing cardiovascular disease. A meta study by this same researcher (American Journal of Epidemiology, 11/03/2005), pointed out to the possibility that arsenic significantly increases the risk of developing coronary disease, stroke and peripheral arterial disease. Considering all this, the question is how safe is the current "safe" level of arsenic in drinking water - assuming it is effectively enforced, which is not a fair assumption. And, don't forget, arsenic is only the tip of the iceberg, that is, of hundreds other toxins and contaminants present in our drinking water. We are still waiting for a study that would try to assess their cumulative effect. R YOUR BODY ┆ HEALTH RECIPE ┆ NUTRITION ┆ TOXINS ┆ SYMPTOMS |