|
■
Home ■ site map |
healthknot.com |
|
Health news:
May 2010
April 2010
Salt studies: the latest score
March 2010
February 2010
The MMR vaccine war: Wakefield vs. ? Wakefield proceedings: an exception?
Who's afraid of a littl' 1998 study?
January 2010
Physical activity benefits late-life health Healthier life for New Year's resolution
December 2009
Autism epidemic worsening: CDC report Rosuvastatin indication broadened
November 2009
Folic acid studies: message in a bottle? Sweet, short life on a sugary diet
October 2009
Smoking health hazards: no dose-response Asthma risk and waist size in women
September 2009
Antioxidants' melanoma risk: 4-fold or none? Murky waters of vitamin D status Is vitamin D deficiency hurting you?
August 2009
New gut test for children and adults Unhealthy habits - whistling past the graveyard?
July 2009
Asthma solution - between two opposites that don't attract Light wave therapy - how does it actually work?
Hodgkin's lymphoma in children: better
alternatives
June 2009
Hodgkin's, kids, and the abuse of power
Efficacy and safety of the
conventional treatment for Hodgkin's:
Long-term mortality and morbidity after
conventional treatments for pediatric Hodgkin's
May 2009
Late health effects of the toxicity of the conventional treatment for Hodgkin's Daniel's true 5-year chances with the conventional treatment for Hodgkin's Daniel Hauser Hodgkin's case: child protection or medical oppression?
April 2009
Protection from EMF: you're on your own EMF pollution battle: same old...
EMF
health threat and the politics of status quo
March 2009
Electromagnetic danger? No such thing, in our view...
February 2009
Electromagnetic spectrum: health connection Is power pollution making you sick?
January 2009
Pneumococcal vaccine for adults useless? DHA in brain development study - why not boys? |
February 2008 Diabetes drugs, side effectsACCORD study - Diabetes 2 drugs - Other drugs - Conclusion Drugs used in diabetes two treatment, just like any other drug, have possible adverse side effects. Those used in the ACCORD study were insulin, older diabetes drug Glucophage, as well as new diabetes drugs, Avandia and Actos. Here is the summary of what was known beforehand about the risks associated with them.It is known that insulin injections produce only temporary benefit in diabetics, due to related weight gain and increase in insulin resistance. In order to keep insulin injection beneficial, the dose has to be constantly increasing. The consequence is significant weight gain, one of the major cardiovascular risks. Participants in the intense arm of the study were receiving up to four shots of insulin a day, compared to a standard single shot. Avandia and Actos both have long history of suspicions and warnings of causing increased cardiovascular risk. Starting with the very beginning, 1999: the manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline, was accused of trying to intimidate doctor questioning Avandia's safety (New York Times), 2002: internal FDA memo warning about post marketing reports of the two drugs causing heart failure (Public Citizen), 2003: government-sponsored research finding that all three, Glucophage, Avandia and Actos were inappropriately and increasingly prescribed to patients with heart failure (JAMA), 2006: recommendation of then FDA drug safety supervisor Dr. Rosemary Johann-Liang to add black box warning to Avandia and Actos (not only the recommendation was ignored, Dr. Johann-Liang was punished, which resulted in her resignation), 2007: meta-study by Nissen finding that Avandia increases heart attack risk by 43%, with the subsequent FDA's own research confirming it. This - finally - resulted in a formal official request to add appropriate black box warning for both, Avandia and Actos. Unlike Actos, Avandia has been found to increase cardiovascular risk even more in those with diabetes. It is probably due to it being more frequently causing fluid retention. Both drugs have weight gain as a common side effects. In addition, their interactions with various cardiovascular drugs are a suspect risk-wise, and still fairly obscured. Metformin alone did show the capability to reduce cardiovascular risk. At list in part, it can be attributed to it, unlike the other two drugs, not causing weight gain. However, for safety reasons it is not prescribed to those having acute symptoms of cardiovascular disease, and its possible negative interactions with other drugs are not well understood. It is known that when combined with some anti-hypertension drugs (e.g. calcium channel blockers) it can produce hyperglycemia, even loss of glycemic control. Also, it can be dangerous for those with compromised liver and/or renal function. And, keep in mind, this is all for standard doses of these medications. Adverse effects typically increase exponentially with the dose, and participants in the intense arm of the ACCORD study have been receiving two to three times higher doses of blood
glucose lowering drugs
Evidently, diabetes II medications, even in standard doses
have the history of potentially significant adverse health
effects. That is more than sufficient reason to be wary of possible -
and probable - harm to study participants from significantly
higher doses of these medications. More so in combination with
high doses of anti-hypertension and cholesterol drugs.
For some reason, the professionals in charge of conceiving, designing, approving end carrying out this study ignored this glaringly obvious risk factor. Continues: High blood pressure and cholesterol drugs YOUR BODY ┆ HEALTH RECIPE ┆ NUTRITION ┆ TOXINS ┆ SYMPTOMS |